Maggie Mahar:
On Sunday the New York Times published an editorial that set out to analyze “The High Cost of Health Care.” The result might best be described as “muddled.” What is exasperating is that about 85 percent of the facts in the editorial are true. But a good 15 percent are simply wrong. And the Times’ editors managed to weave truth and error together in such a way that it would take a knitting needle to separate the two. As Matthew Holt put it on The Health Care Blog: “the piece looks entirely as though it was written by a committee that couldn’t agree with itself.” As you read the editorial, you can almost see the editors sitting around a table, negotiating. “Okay, we’ll let that sentence about the value we’re getting for our dollars stand—as long as well keep this sentence about ‘skin in the game.’” The result, a mix of propaganda and analysis, is far more dangerous than outright lies because the many true facts make the whole thing sound credible…